We may be witnessing the inevitable decline of the United States as a global superpower—a downfall driven not only by internal and external tensions but also by the rise of oligarchs who, from the White House and other seats of power, self-proclaim themselves as global leaders. The recent controversy surrounding a widely reported fascist salute seems to be a disturbing confirmation of this reality.
This is far from an isolated case. For some time, I have been gathering evidence on Elon Reeve Musk, a magnate whose rhetoric and actions have been accused of being steeped in white supremacy and affinities with extreme ideologies, including Nazism. These accusations against Musk are not mere rumors; they are supported by a growing body of evidence shedding light on his connections, statements, and business decisions that have sparked concern across various sectors.
Detailed information on this subject, including an analysis of the entrepreneur’s actions, is available via a link accompanying this article. There, his alleged ideological leanings and influence on an increasingly polarized political landscape are thoroughly examined.
Twitter’s logo change to X is no coincidence
When Elon Musk made the controversial decision to replace Twitter’s iconic blue bird logo with a stark, minimalist “X,” the move was initially seen as either a bid for simplicity or a bold rebranding strategy. However, for those who have closely followed his career, this choice carries far deeper significance. Musk’s fascination with the letter X is unmistakable—a symbol that has surfaced repeatedly in his personal and professional life, from the name of his company SpaceX to his platform X.com, the Tesla Model X, and even his son’s name, X Æ A-12.
While this fixation may seem casual at first glance, it takes on a more unsettling tone when examined for its possible connotations. In an analysis published in Psychology Today, Leon F. Seltzer delves into the “nihilistic” values often associated with the letter X. Seltzer describes it as a symbol that encompasses a wide range of meanings, from neutral to deeply ominous. He notes its associations with various concepts, including the Nazi swastika, danger warnings like the skull and crossbones on poison bottles, Roman numerals, voting marks, and even Christmas, as abbreviated in “Xmas.”
This multifaceted nature makes X a symbol laden with ambiguity: it can signify everything and nothing at once. It is, in essence, a blank slate onto which ideas of power, danger, and dominance—yet also emptiness—can be projected. This symbolism aligns closely with Musk’s public persona: a polarizing figure who, for some, represents the future of innovation, while for others, embodies the risks of authoritarian and unscrupulous leadership.
Elon Musk supports dangerous conspiracy theories
The Great Replacement Theory is a conspiracy narrative that has gained traction among far-right and white supremacist movements. According to this theory, there is a supposed systematic plan to replace white populations in Western countries through mass immigration and high birth rates among ethnic minorities. The theory also accuses “globalist elites” of orchestrating these policies, fueling rhetoric steeped in hatred and racial division.
On November 15, 2023, Elon Musk, one of the most influential figures in the world, reignited concerns by publicly endorsing an antisemitic comment on Twitter (now X). The post by user @breakingbaht claimed that “Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred [sic] against whites that they claim they want people to stop using against them.” Rather than distancing himself from this dangerous rhetoric, Musk chillingly replied: “You have said the actual truth.”
Musk’s response not only validated the original comment but also aligned him directly with the conspiratorial narrative of the “Great Replacement.” This theory, promoted by far-right extremists, argues that white people are being systematically displaced from positions of power and representation in society by a deliberate plot aimed at favoring non-white populations.
The antisemitic comments from Musk
Elon Musk, a man who has shaped the modern technological and business landscape, is increasingly under public scrutiny—not only for his corporate decisions but also for his history of comments and actions perceived as antisemitic. In November 2023, his affirmative response to a post accusing Jewish communities of promoting “hatred against whites” sparked a wave of criticism. The White House quickly condemned the act, describing it as a “vile encouragement” of antisemitism, at a time when global tensions over hate speech were on the rise.
The reaction from major corporations was swift and decisive. Giants like IBM, Apple, Disney, and Lionsgate suspended their advertising campaigns on X, expressing concern over the platform’s lack of moderation and the risk of their ads appearing alongside antisemitic content. This advertising exodus dealt a financial blow to X and highlighted the growing rejection of Musk’s public stances.
In an apparent attempt to repair the damage, Musk visited the Nazi concentration camp of Auschwitz in January 2024. During this visit, the mogul paid tribute to Holocaust victims, walking on the grounds where millions were murdered under the Nazi regime. While some viewed this gesture as an act of reconciliation, others dismissed it as a calculated move to mitigate criticism, especially given that his public image had already been severely tarnished.
The Auschwitz visit could have been a significant moment to shift the narrative surrounding Musk. However, his history of statements, coupled with the fact that he never issued a direct apology for his previous comments, left many questioning the sincerity of his gesture. For his critics, such acts are insufficient to counterbalance the impact of the platforms he leads, which, according to them, have facilitated the spread of hate speech.
Elon’s support for neonazi parties.
Alternative for Germany (Alternative für Deutschland, AfD) has become a central figure in the European political landscape in recent years. What began as an opposition party to the European Central Bank’s monetary policy under Mario Draghi has evolved into a formation characterized by xenophobic, nationalist rhetoric, and, for many, represents a disturbing echo of Germany’s darkest past. In 2024, the AfD solidified its position as the country’s second-largest political force, alarming advocates of liberal democracy and underscoring the rise of far-right populism across Europe.
In an unexpected turn, Elon Musk publicly declared his support for the party. In an opinion piece published on December 28, 2024, in the German newspaper Die Welt, Musk justified his endorsement by stating that the AfD “paves the way” for necessary change in a country he believes is “settled in mediocrity.” “Germany has settled in mediocrity. It is time for bold changes, and AfD is the only party opening this path,” the mogul wrote.
Musk’s support for the AfD is more than just a political statement: it lends legitimacy to a party whose narrative is based on rejecting immigration, skepticism about climate change, and a reinterpretation of Germany’s past that downplays the atrocities of the Third Reich. This endorsement is particularly alarming given Musk’s global influence and his ability to shape public opinion through his platforms and businesses.
The AfD has faced criticism for its connections to extremist ideologies. Prominent figures within the party have made comments that downplay the Holocaust, while some of its leaders have defended openly discriminatory policies against minorities. Supporting this party means aligning with a vision of Germany that many consider incompatible with the values of equality, inclusion, and historical memory that have been foundational to the country’s post-World War II reconstruction.
The controversial fascist salute
In a moment that will be etched into collective memory, Elon Musk, a prominent figure in Donald Trump’s administration, made a gesture many consider a clear “sieg heil” during the inauguration celebration of the Republican president at the Capital One Arena in Washington. This act not only marked a turning point in the public narrative surrounding Musk but also sparked a global media and political storm.
The gesture, performed in front of thousands of supporters in the stadium and millions more watching on screens, involved a chest thump with his right hand followed by an arm extension with the palm facing downward—movement that, according to experts like Claire Aubin, a historian specializing in Nazism in the U.S., closely resembles the banned Nazi salute in Germany. The repeated gesture directed at the audience behind him only heightened the perception that this was not an accident, but a deliberate act laden with symbolism.
A Dual Intent: Pride and Media Strategy
Musk’s gesture carries multiple layers of interpretation. On one hand, it represents a moment of personal pride and ideological radicalization. Musk, who now combines his roles as both entrepreneur and political figure, appears to be publicly adopting extreme positions that were previously concealed behind his image as a technological visionary. In his mind, being at the pinnacle of the world as the richest and most powerful man grants him the freedom to openly express his beliefs, however controversial they may be.
On the other hand, the act was a calculated move to provoke a media reaction. Musk, owner of the platform X and a skilled manipulator of public discourse, knows how to capture global attention. This gesture not only guaranteed headlines worldwide but also provided an opportunity to strengthen a key narrative of Trump’s administration: distrust of the media. By generating a wave of criticism, Musk seems to be positioning himself as a victim of “media harassment,” using the scandal as a tool to divert attention from more critical issues and solidify his support base.
